[159835] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kratzer)
Wed Jan 23 18:22:15 2013

Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:21:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Kratzer <ck-lists@cksoft.de>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGW6zLvzGLyt4F5UjfrNOrNHGBaTMV04UgAmW0++Et10mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: Christian Kratzer <ck@cksoft.de>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Hi,

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, William Herrin wrote:
<snipp/>
> The algorithm will exclude the .0 and .255 external addresses from
> use, mapping the respective internal IPs to the other externals.
<snipp/>

why would you want to do that. .0 and .255 are perfectly valid ips.

Greetings
Christian

-- 
Christian Kratzer                      CK Software GmbH
Email:   ck@cksoft.de                  Wildberger Weg 24/2
Phone:   +49 7032 893 997 - 0          D-71126 Gaeufelden
Fax:     +49 7032 893 997 - 9          HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart
Web:     http://www.cksoft.de/         Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post