[159743] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sat Jan 19 16:19:34 2013
To: Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:26:53 +0000."
<CAAAas8H_0s4E8b82hiXbG+je-dcY7u0gV_G7wo63yS=Z+XRfrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:17:48 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1358630268_2156P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:26:53 +0000, Mike Jones said:
> Potentially another source of IPv4 addresses - every content network
> (/hosting provider/etc) that decides they don't want to give their
> customers IPv6 reachability is a future bankrupt ISP with a load of
> IPv4 to sell off :)
The problem is that content networks tend to be a lot smaller than eyeball
networks. Even AS15169 fits inside a single /12. How long will that
sustain the average IPv6-adverse eyeball network?
--==_Exmh_1358630268_2156P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=q+lD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1358630268_2156P--
