[159719] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jan 18 14:48:05 2013
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:03:31 -0500."
<CAP-guGU9P_ey8qrwZqohfSPsZRVmVty-on1Y4Bh4jOBi3VKgKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:46:15 -0500
Cc: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1358538375_1983P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:03:31 -0500, William Herrin said:
> On the technical side, enterprises have been doing large-scale NAT for
> more than a decade now without any doomsday consequences. CGN is not
> different.
Corporate enterprises have been pushing GPO to the desktop for more
than a decade as well. Feel free to try to push GPO to Joe Sixpack's PC,
let me know how that works out for you.
--==_Exmh_1358538375_1983P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=wnqo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1358538375_1983P--
