[159687] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Ross)
Thu Jan 17 23:19:43 2013
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:19:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Brandon Ross <bross@pobox.com>
To: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPKkNb77Srujq4JZ=CGZ9HbgChyDnd8B=o3aDW12vENooBEosA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> I'm currently using NAT444444, with at least two layers of 802.11g
> WiFi and 5 routers that seem to be doing independent NAT. Two of them
> are mine, then the other 3 are of the ISP, to whom I connect through
> 802.11g, and it generally works just fine; traceroute on the final
> hosts shows 5 first hops being in various separate 192.168.0.0/16 and
> 10.0.0.0/8 networks.
Is the output of traceroute you reference above what you base your
supposition on that you are behind multiple NATs? Or do you have some
other information indicating so?
--
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross
