[159609] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Wed Jan 16 12:07:32 2013
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:03:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACQ0Xp+53nnPqzRqiW9T2cFw6-VD8Ln6eFEYHW+SSSN2pH_cWw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Daniel Ankers wrote:
> In other words, it makes sense to be able to support customers who won't
> move to IPv6 in the short-medium term, even though in the long term it's
> inevitable.
I agree, IPv6 isn't an answer to "we're out of IPv4 addresses" right now.
So CGNAT44 i combination with IPv6 rollout makes perfect sense.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
