[159572] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Issues with level3?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Carpenter)
Tue Jan 15 13:04:45 2013
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:04:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F59769.8080206@bogus.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
> >> I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
> > More efficient that way - "class c" uses fewer syllables than
> > "slash
> > twenty four" :-)
> >
> You realize that class-c address space was only found within 192/8
> e.g.
> if you print it in hex, C0000000. so not only is it historically
> irrelevant but you're using it wrong anyway.
But, class B is not B0000000 and A is not A0000000, so is that actually true, or just a coincidence?
Class C was actually 192.0.0.0-223.255.255.255 (192.0.0.0/3)
-Randy
