[159526] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: De-funding the ITU
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Crocker)
Sun Jan 13 13:02:22 2013
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:01:58 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B74917C@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Cc: "<nanog@nanog.org>" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/12/2013 9:04 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> ITU-D and ITU-R do a lot of good work.
-R is excluded from the petition. (From a number of postings, it appears
that many folk haven't noticed that.)
I don't know anything about -D.
In the interest of adding some core information to the thread, could you
provide a brief summary of its job and benefits (with any concerns that
are broadly held)?
I'm not asking you to defend your views but to provide a most basic
tutorial on -D. The more objective the better.
Thanks.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
