[159439] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.)
Thu Jan 10 13:53:10 2013
From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell@isipp.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.12498.1357828533.12739.nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:52:59 -0700
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Just as a data point (and to initiate my semi-annual 'I'm still here' =
email), we of course check for and require PTRs for all of our email =
accreditation customers, many of which are ESPs, and you would be =
*shocked* (or maybe you wouldn't) how many otherwise relatively clueful =
and 'wanting to do it right' senders have no clue at all about PTR.
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq
CEO/President
Institute for Social Internet Public Policy
http://www.ISIPP.com=20
Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
How do you get to the inbox instead of the spam filter? SuretyMail!
How do you protect your inboxes from spam while reducing false =
positives? SuretyMail!
http://www.SuretyMail.com
