[159344] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: OOB core router connectivity wish list

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Wed Jan 9 11:55:17 2013

Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:55:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20130109164803.GA30676@pob.ytti.fi>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Saku Ytti wrote:

> Agreed. IPv4 would be priority for most.

Today yes. In 2-4 years when this might be a reality, I don't want IPv4 
only device. I rather go for IPv6 only immediately.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post