[159199] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Netflix transit preference?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Temkin)
Sat Dec 29 05:12:06 2012
In-Reply-To: <86ip7nje2j.fsf@seastrom.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 05:11:47 -0500
From: David Temkin <dave@temk.in>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi all,
We (Netflix) reached out to Randal off-list to explain how our
transit/peering methodology works.
Feel free to reach out to peering@netflix.com for questions like this in
the future.
-Dave
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Robert E. Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com> wrote:
>
> Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu> writes:
>
> > On 12/27/2012 1:26 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k <nanog@data102.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> (We move ~1.4gbps to Netflix, and are thus not a candidate for
> >>> peering. And they have no POP close.)
> >> Why don't you ask Netflix? And why not ask them for kit to put on-net?
> >> <https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect>
> >
> > The last time we asked, their criteria was ~2.0gbps, so he doesn't have
> > enough qualifying traffic.
> >
> > Has anyone looked at a Qwilt? http://www.qwilt.com/
>
> MiM-ing streaming media providers is filed under "encourage my
> competitors to do this". It's likely to make your phone ring.
>
> -r
>
>
>
>
