[15896] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: consistency and cix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Howard C. Berkowitz)
Fri Mar 27 16:08:20 1998
In-Reply-To: <13596.3025.40634.584410@rip.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 15:45:24 -0500
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "Justin W. Newton" <justin@gid.net>
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
At 12:28 -0800 3/27/98, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Actually, sounds like a political issue to me.
>>
>> What do your peering contracts say?
>
>if the the cix relationship is mutual purchase of transit from a third
>party, then V and X have no contractual relationship.
>
>randy
To review the bidding, the following relationships exist?
Contractual V X Y CIX
V - no no yes
X no - yes yes
Y no yes - no
Advertises V X Y CIX
V - yes no yes
X no - yes yes
Y no yes - yes
