[158942] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Strict route filtering at IX?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold Nipper)
Sun Dec 16 16:13:47 2012
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:13:23 +0100
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
To: Dan Luedtke <mail@danrl.de>
In-Reply-To: <20121212122209.1f2b08e7@marvin.nonattached.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig746D9A3A96B9DB4738B96A25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12.12.2012 12:22, Dan Luedtke wrote:
> So, here's the question: How do you filter at exchanges?
Afaik BCP is to not prefix- as-path/origing-filtering well maintained
routeservers at an IXP but simply put in max prefix limits.
Arnold
--=20
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold@nipper.de phone: +49 6224 5593407 2
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 5593407 9
--------------enig746D9A3A96B9DB4738B96A25
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlDOOX0ACgkQrz6CwpRB/Ex4kwCcCY3LVGc3C5CzwzIjkO1LE1a+
UckAoI36BQaM6vcsrmWj9hCm3S2LyLWX
=ctFm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig746D9A3A96B9DB4738B96A25--
