[158886] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Advisory =?utf-8?B?4oCUIEQtcm9v?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Dec 14 14:40:01 2012
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:38:03 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
In-Reply-To: <667257.38749.1355513143346.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:25:43PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joe Abley" <jabley@hopcount.ca>
>
> > >> Quite so: UMD: Where will the old IP route after the 6 month period
> > >> is complete? Somewhere safe?
>
> > As I understand it (but ask UMD!)
> >
> > - D-Root is currently numbered out of a general-purpose UMD /16 into a
> > dedicated, specifically-assigned /24
> > - the UMD /16 is not going anywhere
> >
> > The announcement is that D-Root is being renumbered, not that UMD is
> > renumbering its whole network.
>
> So, in short, UMD will still own the losing allocation, and be able to make
> relatively sure nothing else is placed at that IP (though of course they
> won't necessarily be able to make sure no one hijacks that entire prefix --
> does Renesys have a pay-special-attention list?)
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
But how do you know the Renesys allocations haven't been hijacked??
/bill
