[158795] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RADB entry
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Dec 11 09:51:44 2012
In-Reply-To: <039a01cdd7a3$d056e850$7104b8f0$@telic.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:51:10 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Eric Krichbaum <eric@telic.us>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eric Krichbaum <eric@telic.us> wrote:
> The origin being entered by a
> provider as their own allows them to add the prefix (and have it accepted by
> anyone who filters them by prefix generated) without being forced to add a
> downstream (and downstream's downstreams) AS to their AS-SET.
'proxy registration'... so nice... now you can't control your prefix
data in radb, how quaint!
'proxy registration' - never a good idea... not ever... adding cruft
that's not connected to the data owner to the database? recipe for
stale/old-n-busted data... hurray.
