[158757] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Bertrand)
Sun Dec 9 23:19:15 2012
From: Steve Bertrand <steve.bertrand@amayagaming.com>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:21:20 +0000
In-Reply-To: <19252C31-EB10-40CC-A5D8-BFBAF53C6E65@steffann.nl>
Cc: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> > Ok, so I'll give you that tunneling a really short bit, tunneling
> isn't too bad, but native is most of the time better.
>=20
> So sad that some companies mess up in such a way that their
> customers rather tunnel than use their native infra... :-(
The ISPs are unfortunately behind what the tunnel providers have supplied. =
It is what it is. Even 'companies' who were told by early adopters and said=
"we should focus" didn't. The result is :)
Steve
