[158600] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Any enterprise operators very happy with their MPLS providers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Nakamura)
Wed Dec 5 09:22:31 2012
In-Reply-To: <12B3AEACEC284C4AA5D4CB88D3D345B501FB175845@ATL01VMB001WP.tkitna.local>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:21:43 -0500
From: Jay Nakamura <zeusdadog@gmail.com>
To: "McCall, Gabriel" <Gabriel.McCall@thyssenkrupp.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We have had pretty good result with Century Link (Formerly Qwest)
although not on a 100+ node scale..
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:14 AM, McCall, Gabriel
<Gabriel.McCall@thyssenkrupp.com> wrote:
> I'm getting ready to prepare an RFP for our next generation WAN, and woul=
d like feedback from anyone else who has 100+ MPLS nodes on their quality o=
f account service and technical performance.
>
> My current landscape includes AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon. I'm almost compl=
etely happy with Sprint- they're about in the A- range. AT&T is muddling al=
ong at about a C, and Verizon is a solid F. I've heard very good things fro=
m some CenturyLink customers and will definitely include them in the bidder=
list- is anyone else doing a very good job for you?
>
> -Gabriel
>
>
