[158509] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Remaining IPv6 hurdles (Was: Programmers...)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Fri Nov 30 20:13:05 2012

From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 01:12:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <50B93CA7.3020006@unfix.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:

> Japan and South Korea are doing quite well indeed

I guess that depends upon how one defines 'quite well', heh.  They're certa=
inly ahead of other countries in the region with regards to IPv6, but it's =
questionable how deeply/broadly it is both available and utilized by their =
user bases.  And AFAICT, the emphasis is on clients, not servers.

> and China has CERNET of course which is doing mostly IPv6.

But which does not serve China's user base.

> Can you divulge some of these hurdles? Would be interesting to know what =
they are running into.

Architectural issues, operational issues, educational issues, organizationa=
l issues, resiliency issues, scalability issues, security issues, economic =
issues, layer-8, etc.  If one encounters significant challenges in designin=
g, building, and operating an IPv4 network, one is unlikely to expend a sig=
nificant amount of time and resources on IPv6.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

		       -- John Milton



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post