[158325] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?=)
Wed Nov 28 05:05:58 2012
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:05:27 +0100
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211280536300.27834@uplift.swm.pp.se> (Mikael
Abrahamsson's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:38:24 +0100 (CET)")
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, mike wrote:
>
>> You're saying there are no cellular v6 deployments? I'm about 99%
>> certain that you're wrong. I see v6 addresses in my apache logs all
>> the time and they're almost definitely while they're not on wifi (my
>> site uploads gps data while people are skiing, so they're usually on
>> cellular).
>
> I am in Europe. None of Apple och Microsoft mobile devices will do
> IPv6 on the mobile side.
They won't do maps either. Does that mean that maps don't exist?
Try to keep device bugs and network deployment issues separate.
> I don't know if they do special versions for
> the US market, but for general 3GPP networks, it doesn't work.
IPv6 work just fine in 3GPP networks. Also in Europe.
Bj=C3=B8rn
