[158269] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Tue Nov 27 11:49:09 2012
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:47:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <B42C33BB-3732-4AA7-AF82-BE4D1CFFAB68@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> Obviously, they deployed IPv6 for other reasons, and it would be far
> more useful to know *why* they deployed it in the first place (i.e., as
> an experiment, because their user base is outstripping their IPv4
> allocations, etc.).
IPv6 deployment is not a short-term answer to IPv4 exhaustion. Can we
please just put this to rest?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
