[158261] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Tue Nov 27 05:32:23 2012

From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:32:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <m2pq2z8hq3.wl%randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Nov 27, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

> sorry if the facts did not support your conclusion.  they do support mine=
.=20

Pointers to these facts would be greatly appreciated, especially as no one =
else seems to know where to find them.

;>

> big initial ipv6 traffic bump

This is what I question.

> but long ipv4 tail.

I agree with this one, of course.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

		       -- John Milton



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post