[158250] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Tue Nov 27 00:08:24 2012
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 05:07:48 +0000
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211270555410.27834@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> The problem is that CGN and NAT444 works with todays devices, whereas IPv=
6 does not (thinking mobile devices and residential CPEs).
Yet everyone (except you) insist that it does work with everything, and tha=
t all this CGN and 444 stuff and 644 stuff isn't necessary, and that I'm a =
fool for doubting all these (to me) wildly overoptimistic assertions about =
the coming ubiquity of native IPv6, end-to-end, heh.
It sort of reminds me of how artificial intelligence has been only 10 years=
away for the last 60 years or so.
;>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
