[158248] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Mon Nov 26 23:58:01 2012
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 05:57:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <45BC0F26-506F-4D43-9A28-2F3623EA9779@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> Again, all the attention being lavished upon CGNs and 444 and whatnot
> are quite interesting indicators of perceived priorities.
The problem is that CGN and NAT444 works with todays devices, whereas
IPv6 does not (thinking mobile devices and residential CPEs).
IPv6 is not today a viable alternative to CGN, one has to do both for a
while before hopefully devices can do IPv6-only access and one can then
have a centrally placed NAT64 (or similar) gateway.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
