[158224] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Mon Nov 26 18:06:22 2012
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:05:45 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQJ4mjy5U=TY1noorwHiUzh1f5JuumdhDq_p8eLCr700Q@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:15 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> NAT is bad.=20
I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment. I'm unsure whether or not this=
is the prevalent view amongst those who control the pursestrings within ne=
twork operators, however.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
