[158192] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Mon Nov 26 07:57:55 2012
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:57:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <50B35C4B.7090602@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 26, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> Users do not care and they will never have a "deliberate migration".
I understand this. However, the way that IPv6 migration is discussed in mo=
st contexts seems to be predicated upon the notion that there is some indus=
try imperative to light up network with IPv6. My point is that there is no=
t.
> IMHO if the user choose to change or not it is the least important, the r=
eal important fact is that IPv6 is taking up no matter if it is or not deli=
berate used by the users.
I disagree somewhat with this view. The significant question is whether th=
e users are actually accessing apps/services/content via IPv6, or if it's e=
ssentially white noise.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
