[158181] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Edelman)
Mon Nov 26 00:03:56 2012
From: "Dave Edelman" <dedelman@iname.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <50ae13c5.b0eb440a.3c9b.ffffa9df@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:32:26 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is the first reasonable, rational, and well-defined argument for not
making the transition to IPv6.
As to someone's question about "Are you a terrorist?" If there is such a
construct as a transitive noun, then this might qualify. People rarely
describe themselves as terrorists, typically non-disinterested third-parties
describe them as such.
--Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ammar Salih [mailto:ammar.salih@auis.edu.iq]
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:00 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
>
> Dears, I've proposed a new IPv6 "extension header", it's now posted on
IETF
> website, your ideas and comments are most welcome!
>
>
>
>
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-add-location-to-ipv6-header/?include_t
> ext=1
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ammar Salih
>
>
>
>
