[158178] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy)
Sun Nov 25 23:28:54 2012

Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:28:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Randy <randy_94108@yahoo.com>
To: Network IPdog <network.ipdog@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50b2d756.43f1440a.2774.571e@mx.google.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Just because it is from Iraq; does NOT mean by any streach of the imaginati=
on that OP is a terrorist!
You need to get outside the box you are living in and learn to separate the=
 forest from the trees!

You are "entitled" to you private-opinions. Don't post said-garbage on NANO=
G!

I do take exception to such garbage; while other's might not.

./Randy

--- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ipdog@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Network IPdog <network.ipdog@gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> To: "'Randy'" <randy_94108@yahoo.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 6:43 PM
> The email address is
> from=E2=80=A6=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0auis.edu.iq =3D Iraq
>=20
> Sometimes persons living inside the box cannot see the
> forest because of the
> trees.
>=20
>  PEACE
>=20
>=20
> Ephesians 4:32=C2=A0 &=C2=A0 Cheers!!!
>=20
> A password is like a... toothbrush=C2=A0 ;^)=20
> Choose a good one, change it regularly and don't share it.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy [mailto:randy_94108@yahoo.com]
>=20
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:52 PM
> To: Network IPdog
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
>=20
> WHAT???
>=20
> Is this the extent to which This-List has DEGENERATED???
>=20
> How dare you make such a horrendous accusation Sir?
>=20
> You may NOT like what OP has proposed. I don't either for
> more reasons than
> one!
>=20
> However, YOU are neither qualified NOR authorised to ask
> such an appallingly
> INSENSITIVE Question!
>=20
> Your so called "Freedom-of-Speech" DOES NOT translate to
> Character-Assasination on this or any other forum!!
>=20
> Follow me you ipdog? Find you own bitch to abuse. Don't do
> it here!!
>=20
> ./Randy
>=20
> --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ipdog@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>=20
> > From: Network IPdog <network.ipdog@gmail.com>
> > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> > To: "'John Adams'" <jna@retina.net>,
> "'Ammar Salih'"=20
> > <ammar.salih@auis.edu.iq>
> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> > Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 3:16 PM Et al,
> >=20
> > There is one simple question that needs to be asked!
> >=20
> >=20
> > Ammar Salih @ ammar.salih@auis.edu.iq
> > Are you a terrorist?=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Ephesians 4:32=C2=A0 &=C2=A0 Cheers!!!
> >=20
> > A password is like a... toothbrush=C2=A0 ;^) Choose a good
> one, change it=20
> > regularly and don't share it.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Adams [mailto:jna@retina.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:20 PM
> > To: Ammar Salih
> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> > list
> > Subject: Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> >=20
> > Your proposal doesn't even give people a way to encrypt
> their location=20
> > data; By moving geodata to a portion of the protocol
> which is not=20
> > covered by commonly used encryption methods (i.e.
> HTTPS, which is up a=20
> > few layers in the stack) people can't be protected
> should this data be=20
> > monitored by a malicious intermediary. Think: Syria,
> China, Iran, or=20
> > any other government which will kill you for your words
> online.
> >=20
> > Application protocols sending GPS data under say, HTTPS
> protect the=20
> > end user from revealing their location to anyone on
> their path,=20
> > forcing an intermediary to look up the IP in a common
> geo database=20
> > which will be mostly inaccurate in pinpointing users,
> and hopefully=20
> > will save lives.
> >=20
> > Companies like Twitter, Facebook, and some parts of
> google are going=20
> > HTTPS by default for this very reason.
> >=20
> > This proposal is dead, you don't have the sense to lie
> down.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post