[158169] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Sun Nov 25 07:42:46 2012
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:42:31 +0100
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <7B2C3091-763E-4C03-86E7-DE38694482A0@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--UJEqbsikIZBgizPR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Date: Sun, Nov 25, 20=
12 at 04:29:15AM +0000 Quoting Dobbins, Roland (rdobbins@arbor.net):
>=20
> On Nov 25, 2012, at 10:09 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
>=20
> > from goeff huston's data they have more v6 at home.
>=20
> And not purposely, either - because it's enabled by default on recent cli=
ent OSes. My guess is that a non-trivial fraction of observed IPv6 traffic=
today is unintentional.
This is excellent! It is not likely that any end-user traffic over IPv4
is intentionally sent over IPv4. It is sent to Facebook. (eh, faceb00c,
of course) Likewise, the -4 and -6 options for SSH are there for debugging
and fault mitigation, nothing else.
I'm quite satisfied that this now is the norm. It's the only way we'll be
able to restore e2e on the Internet and evolve beyond simple client-server
models like TN3270^H^H^H^Hthe web.=20
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
I didn't order any WOO-WOO ... Maybe a YUBBA ... But no WOO-WOO!
--UJEqbsikIZBgizPR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlCyEjYACgkQ02/pMZDM1cWzyACeMts/jJMl+xliZ5ejlaW3Bh3k
DDUAoJRGCs/XonUpXETc7IU/d3fqv+/E
=jxUV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UJEqbsikIZBgizPR--
