[158061] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Tue Nov 20 11:08:18 2012
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <A698CA61-CAED-4625-9B3D-3F758C00A944@delong.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:05:26 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for =
a number
> of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too:
<https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/>
This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet =
than a specific company's content. It shows order of 0.5%.
Why do you think Google's numbers are lower than the real total?
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>>> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
>>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics
>>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. =
Some
>>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 =
:-)
>>=20
>> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
>>=20
>> --=20
>> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
>> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
>> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
>=20
>=20
