[158050] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Oliver Garraux)
Tue Nov 20 09:58:21 2012
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211200902280.15151@iskra.ottix.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:57:40 -0500
From: Oliver Garraux <oliver@g.garraux.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" percentage?
Oliver
-------------------------------------
Oliver Garraux
Check out my blog: www.GetSimpliciti.com/blog
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
<wmaton@ottix.net> wrote:
>
> APNIC labs have an interesting set of numbers on IPv6 uptake as well.
>
> http://labs.apnic.net/measureipv6/
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
>> number
>> of reasons.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
>>>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics
>>>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
>>>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
>>>
>>> --
>>> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
>>> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
>>> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> wfms
>
