[158021] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fiber terminations -- UPC vs APC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Nov 19 16:51:32 2012
To: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:37:05 -0500."
<50AAA681.6020005@utc.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:48:56 -0500
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1353361736_1855P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:37:05 -0500, Jeff Kell said:
> The video folks are set, determined, and insistent that they need APC terminations.
>
> All data references I have found preach UPC.
Remember - the nozzles on unleaded gas pumps aren't interchangeable with the
ones that dispense leaded gas (if any of those still exist?). Perhaps
somebody decided this was a good idea for video and data as well?
--==_Exmh_1353361736_1855P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=T7A4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1353361736_1855P--
