[157877] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Griggs)
Tue Nov 13 16:58:40 2012
From: Daniel Griggs <daniel@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <50A2A696.7070403@rollernet.us>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:54:39 +1300
To: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Seth,
A previous employer we looked at a few UPS.
We used Emerson GXT2/3 3Kva UPSs and they worked a treat.
We also tried the Eaton 9130 and we never had any problems with them, =
but the SNMP monitoring was only good for telling you if there was a =
problem, not what the problem was. So we eventually went back to the =
Emersons.
On 14/11/2012, at 8:59 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
> they've worked out for you.
>=20
> I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
> since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does =
some
> high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
> thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
> section catch on fire and destroy itself.
>=20
> ~Seth
>=20
--
Daniel
