[157859] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Whats so difficult about ISSU

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Frank Bulk)
Mon Nov 12 17:24:34 2012

From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>
To: "'Kasper Adel'" <karim.adel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALb2afMRykjAP5SXD_R-dr_Cj4UMmy3E=FUuOe_M8HPGJ_Mm4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:24:09 -0600
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: frnkblk@iname.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Compared to our CMTS, our class 5 softswitch cost us less money.  Yet our
CMTS vendor stopped talking about hitless software upgrades 2 years ago
because the upgrade path (from, to, and which software releases you can use)
is so limited it's hardly practical.

 

Frank

 

From: Kasper Adel [mailto:karim.adel@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 12:22 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Whats so difficult about ISSU

 

Hi Frank,

 

Is it because C5 softswitches have expensive hardware, advanced software and
dual asics? I would have never imagined that any vendor is capable of
upgrading fpd's/ASICs ucode without a hit unless there are multiple chips
continuously syncing with each other.

 

Regards,

Kim

On Monday, November 12, 2012, Frank Bulk wrote:

We do it on our Class 5 softswitch ... and it works consistently.  There may
be a few seconds, once, where a new call can't be made, but most people will
re-dial.  It just works.

It can be done, but the product has to be built with that in mind.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Kasper Adel [mailto:karim.adel@gmail.com <javascript:;> ]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 5:23 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Whats so difficult about ISSU

Hello,

We've been hearing about ISSU for so many years and i didnt hear that any
vendor was able to achieve it yet.

What is the technical reason behind that?

If i understand correctly, the way it will be done would be simply to have
extra ASICs/HW to be able to build dual circuits accessing the same memory,
and gracefully switch from one to another. Is that right?

Thanks,
Kim




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post