[157638] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Thu Nov 1 09:07:38 2012

X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:06:29 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <5092690D.8000500@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 01/11/2012 12:20, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> We should better introduce partially decimal format for
> IPv6 addresses or, better, avoid IPv6 entirely.

No we shouldn't.  Text representations of IPv6 addresses are already a
complete pain to parse.  We don't need to add to this pain by adding a new
format which gains us nothing in particular over existing schemas such as
that suggested by Eugeniu.

Nick



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post