[157350] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet-wide port scans
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Oct 16 09:47:41 2012
To: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:48:47 -0400."
<CAFANWtU4BEu24V=0_3DZUyqX0qkjon435mJLp4DXuE8R+nfLsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:46:14 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1350395174_2015P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:48:47 -0400, Darius Jahandarie said:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
> > Want to re-write that section or should I respond now? ;-)
>
> I always thought it wasn't allowed because of 18 USC 2701, but
> IINAL, would be happy to hear otherwise :)
If a portscan allows access to stored communications, you have bigger
problems.
--==_Exmh_1350395174_2015P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=1NP5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1350395174_2015P--
