[157276] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Sat Oct 13 17:14:39 2012
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 23:14:25 +0200
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2sj9imc0w.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--d01dLTUuW90fS44H
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?=
Date: Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:01:51AM -1000 Quoting Randy Bush (randy@psg.=
com):
=20
> /48 is the new /24
Except you can stuff pretty much into one. I'm numbering my entire
workplace from one. 1500 people and 26 offices. Our v4 is a constrained
/16, which is enough. But not more.
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
FROZEN ENTREES may be flung by members of opposing SWANSON SECTS ...
--d01dLTUuW90fS44H
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlB52bAACgkQ02/pMZDM1cXSQgCffZhxeHL5KRwrzJ4ACrLvF7uI
eO8An26JXzzazktGG/IWnltNUDgRYNun
=uJ18
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--d01dLTUuW90fS44H--
