[157268] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Everett, Thomas E.)
Fri Oct 12 08:54:11 2012
From: "Everett, Thomas E." <everettt@mitre.org>
To: "'Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu'" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
"'tal@whatexit.org'" <tal@whatexit.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:53:57 +0000
In-Reply-To: <50317.1349749781@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thomas E Everett bb
Enterprise Systems Engineering & Exploitation [G091]
National Cyber Operations & Support
everettt@mitre.org
MITRE -- 703.983.1400
Cell 978.852.2400
----- Original Message -----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 10:29 PM=0A=
To: Tom Limoncelli <tal@whatexit.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:47:18 -0400, Tom Limoncelli said:
> Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical
> internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes.
Should we include the time spent talking to the help desk trying to resolve
double-NAT'ing issues in the latency?
