[157161] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Oct 8 22:30:24 2012
To: Tom Limoncelli <tal@whatexit.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:47:18 -0400."
<CAHVFxg==eKy2f2PPyPpDCoT3H4yWdxo4nyYW758_iYUo2wScMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:29:41 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1349749781_1975P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:47:18 -0400, Tom Limoncelli said:
> Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical
> internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes.
Should we include the time spent talking to the help desk trying to resolve
double-NAT'ing issues in the latency?
--==_Exmh_1349749781_1975P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=E5NP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1349749781_1975P--
