[157151] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Typical additional latency for CGN?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Limoncelli)
Mon Oct 8 07:46:33 2012
In-Reply-To: <20121008092709.GA32240@srv03.cluenet.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 07:46:21 -0400
From: Tom Limoncelli <tal@whatexit.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 03:18:56PM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> On Oct 7, 2012 1:48 PM, "Tom Limoncelli" <tal@whatexit.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical
>> > internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes.
>> >
>>
>> Anecdote. Sub-millasecond, with full load. (gigs and gigs) . CGN does not
>> meaningfully add latency. CGN is not enough of a factor to impact happy
>> eyeballs in a way that improves ipv6 use.
>
> Confirmed by my experience.
Thanks for the info!
Tom
--
Speaking at MacTech Conference 2012. http://mactech.com/conference
http://EverythingSysadmin.com -- my blog
http://www.TomOnTime.com -- my videos
