[157096] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Fri Oct 5 20:05:36 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAJWBqEs1C3_XwKt2m+RqONwStPt4zCGXEk+Li7wt+N6YbFydzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 21:05:07 -0300
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I know that I should know better then comment on networks others then
my own, ( and I know to never comment on my own publicly :) )
But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard
time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to
larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of
caused this?
I won't even get into max-prefix and how we've managed this long with
someone people still not setting them.
-jim
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Anton Kapela <tkapela@gmail.com> wrote:
> Submitted without comment:
> http://inside.godaddy.com/inside-story-happened-godaddy-com-sept-10-2012/
>
> -Tk
>
