[157073] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv4 address length technical design

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Fri Oct 5 00:23:35 2012

Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 00:23:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20590.7539.491575.455977@world.std.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barry Shein" <bzs@world.std.com>

> In Singapore in June 2011 I gave a talk at HackerSpaceSG about just
> doing away with IP addresses entirely, and DNS.
> 
> Why not just use host names directly as addresses? Bits is bits, FQDNs
> are integers because, um, bits is bits. They're even structured so you
> can route on the network portion etc.
> 
> Routers themselves could hash them into some more efficient form for
> table management but that wouldn't be externally visible. I did
> suggest a standard for such hashing just to help with debugging etc
> but it'd only be a suggestion or perhaps common display format.

And Whacky Weekend begins early.

Jim?  Jim Fleming?  How'd you break into Barry's email account?

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post