[157007] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Oct 3 11:02:43 2012
In-Reply-To: <028101cda16e$d26f5ac0$774e1040$@truenet.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:02:11 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Eric Tykwinski <eric-list@truenet.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Eric Tykwinski <eric-list@truenet.com> wrote:
> I agree, and just use the Threshold plugin so when it drops below or goes
> above a certain # to notify you.
> http://docs.cacti.net/plugin:thold
is a threshold helpful here? (well, it's helpful to a point at least)
what if your neighbour starts deaggragating (or sending you their
internal deaggragates) in place of 50k real routes? no alarm, no
'change' from a numbers perspective, but certainly a traffic shift and
reach-ability change :(
Isn't a speed-of-change threshold also interesting here?
