[156977] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Loveland)
Tue Oct 2 12:39:45 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAKu7voMkyQpc85kaYiMTmx0Urt1MjYKSR4VVm8pJmRUd3hrz_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Loveland <brian@aereo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:37:30 -0400
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@mailman.nanog.org
Sorry, that is IBM G8264T. G8316 is the 16x40G version.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Brian Loveland <brian@aereo.com> wrote:
> Also, IBM G8364 (uses Broadcom Trident merchant silicon).
>
> I believe the Force10 S4810 (also Broadcom Trident) is only SFP+?
>
> Intel will force 10GBASE-T on all of us since they can make it backwards
> compatible with 1000BASE-T. I think this will make the technology take off
> over the next year or so.
>
> Been very happy running SFP+ twinax but sometimes I do wish I could go
> further than 5/7/8.5 meters.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>wrote:
>
>> In article <
>> CAJ0Nkqgy2x9pUg26CcjcHwDQSMY24f1U0RWmhF2PoH2eHih2zg@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Andreas Echavez <andreas@livejournalinc.com> wrote:
>> >Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
>> >seems like the standard just died out.
>>
>> Well, our new supermicro servers come with 10Gbase-T standard on
>> the motherboard.
>>
>> >For us it would make a lot of sense
>> >for our applications -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great.
>> If
>> >anyone out there knows of any *copper* 10 gig-t switches (48 port?)
>>
>> Arista, http://www.aristanetworks.com/
>>
>> Mike.
>>
>>
>
