[156916] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RFC becomes Visio
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cutler James R)
Fri Sep 28 23:15:54 2012
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <201209290241.q8T2fPND088353@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:15:14 -0400
To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>
> <SNIP/>
> The proper approach is to ask the vendor for RFC 1149 trasport for the BGP
> session, and whether it terminates in a shared cage, or if a fully private
> one is required. Including an 'envionmental impact statement'. Explaining
> that this info is required in order to produce an accurate Visio diagram.
>
Ladies and gentlemen, it seems that we have a winner!
