[156820] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon IPv6 LTE
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan Rawdon)
Thu Sep 27 12:44:17 2012
From: Ryan Rawdon <ryan@u13.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKnNFz8x1-YDxNoghz2z4ToYz1T-U9=tTYSaK2tESqjWQpQ2=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:42:48 -0500
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:00 AM, chris wrote:
> I tested today just for giggles, test-ipv6.com shows I have working =
ipv4
> and ipv6 10/10 on both tests. Interestingly enough I was only seeing =
3G on
> the device at the time.
>=20
> So I guess its not just on LTE or is it LTE devices ?
>=20
> I'm running galaxy nexus on vz with stock jelly bean from the recent =
ota
> update
See quote from PC below regarding vzw, which matches colloquial evidence =
I have seen/heard as well. This is also true of T-Mobile's v6 =
deployment when switching between HSPA+, Edge, 3G, etc (though I do not =
know if PC's general explanation of "how" is true of TMo)
On Sep 21, 2012, at 12:15 AM, PC wrote:
> One more tip: IPv6 will work over the legacy 3g network. Don't ask =
me
> much about it, but it "tunnels" it using eHRPD to the same IP/IPv6 =
headend
> to enable seamless EVDO/LTE handover.
>=20
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> Safari on the iPad seems to be preferring A over AAAA if a hostname =
has
>>> both, though. I can browse to a bracketed IPv6 address so it is =
working.
>>>=20
>>=20
>> I think perhaps it is time to update test-ipv6.com a bit, and have it
>> penalize the first number when IPv4 is used in preference. IPv4 CGN
>> will make me a sad panda - especially when IPv6 is available but not =
being
>> used.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
