[156782] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Anyone from Verizon/TATA on here? Possible Packet Loss

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darius Jahandarie)
Wed Sep 26 13:16:44 2012

In-Reply-To: <CAJvB4tkuYEKfbD6ZWEwJeVeke9dS7s4xj7-PYiVK_+VCm9y1xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:16:04 -0400
From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie@gmail.com>
To: Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is not the proper way to interpret traceroute information. Also, 3
> pings is not sufficient to determine levels of packet loss statistically.
>
> I suggest searching the archives regarding traceroute, or googling how to
> interpret them in regards to packet loss, as what you posted does not
> indicate what you think it does.

Agreed. Derek should read "A Practical Guide to (Correctly)
Troubleshooting with Traceroute":
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf

-- 
Darius Jahandarie


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post