|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <CAB8g2zwqNur7fNfgZReiHanJBRSft0byeEW8BnhZ+UOudgYhJw@mail.gmail.com> To: Peter Phaal <peter.phaal@gmail.com> From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon@csc.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:19:58 -0400 Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Peter Phaal <peter.phaal@gmail.com> wrote on 09/24/2012 10:39:26 AM: > When a switch/router decides to sample a packet it records the > ingress/egress interfaces and accumulates information about how it > decided to forward the packet by examining its FIB tables. Each packet > may take a different path, some may by switched at layer 2, others may > be forwarded based on a local routing protocol like OSPF, and still > others may be forwarded based on BGP. OK, Well I guess I was thinking sFlow was primarily a switch oriented technology versus on a layer-3 peering router.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |