[156688] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Real world sflow vs netflow?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Sat Sep 22 19:42:11 2012
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:41:18 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAB8g2zzJ2oMAATUA9_uqeNcqTjtg=or6-LBxkRPp1HE11WzanQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 23, 2012, at 1:51 AM, Peter Phaal wrote:
> Here are some comments and links to additional information that address =
each of your concerns:
You have misinterpreted what I said. I was saying that flow telemetry of a=
ny variety must be exported from edge devices, which in most cases are rout=
ers (in some cases layer-3 switches), in response to your 'move it out of t=
he router' comment.
I disagree quite strongly with your comments regarding s/Flow vs. NetFlow, =
but am not interested in spamming the list with an extended discussion ther=
eof. Let's just agree to disagree on that issue.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
