[156683] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Sat Sep 22 07:39:53 2012
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:21:27 +0900."
<m28vc2fglk.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:39:05 +1000
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <m28vc2fglk.wl%randy@psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
> > Both DS-Lite and NAT64 contain some form of a =ABgiant NAT box=BB as part
> > of the solution, I'm afraid. Same shit, different wrapping.
>
> ds-lite is in the provider core. talk to the telco's lawyers when you
> want to use a new protocol.
DS-lite can be deployed between between customer and anyone that wants
to provide IPv4 service for that customer. I would expect DS-lite to
be out sourced by ISPs.
> nat64 is at my cpe border.
>
> randy
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
