|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 13:05:01 -0500 (EST) From: Marc Hurst <mhurst@fastlane.ca> To: jlixfeld@idirect.ca cc: Pat Darisme <pat@noc.home.net>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980314123404.12871E-100000@industry.idirect.com> On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 jlixfeld@idirect.ca wrote: > No, you should definetly not be able to ping it. Where are you in > respect to home.net? If you are not directly connected to home.net and if > you can ping that IP, then @home is trying to advertise 10.0.184.0 to > their upstreams and they are accepting those advertisments. If you are > on home.net then you will be able to see them. That is definetly wrong > though! I can see if you use 10.x net for un-advertised touch-down nets > between two routers, but you should definetly not be able to ping them > from afar. > No, I'm definitely not part of the @home net. I'm coming in off a dial-up of an independant ISP in Toronto (UUnet/Sprint feeds I believe...). M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |