[156605] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Department of Work and Pensions,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Thu Sep 20 15:10:29 2012
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120920020920.GA16558@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:09:46 -0700
To: Brett Frankenberger <rbf+nanog@panix.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 19, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
> It works fine if the gateway has multiple routing tables (VRF or
> equivalent) and application software that is multiple-routing-table
> aware.
If you are arguing that it is technically possible to build an =
environment in which every piece of software is aware at an application =
level whether or not a given service is inside the network or outside =
the network and thus eliminate issues with routing overlaps=85 uh, sure. =
I agree that you can do this in a very customized environment.
Now if you want to suggest that most businesses with a diversity of =
applications and access methods should be doing this, in order to allow =
overlapping IP usage on the internet, I'm going to have to point and =
giggle.
I really love how everyone keeps advancing these "businesses should =
rebuild their entire infrastructure, at their cost, and with no benefit =
to themselves, so that I can use their IP space!" arguments. Ya huh. =
Right.
--=20
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet =
projects.
